Nama vs Kuvings: Honest Review + Best Alternative
January 02, 2026
If you’re planning to buy a cold-press juicer and comparing Nama vs Kuvings, you’re not alone. This is a common comparison among people ready to invest in a cold-pressed juicer.
Their top models, Nama J2 and Kuvings Auto10, both promise hands-free, high-yield juicing without slowing you down. But when it’s your counter, your routine, and your cleanup, the details matter.
In this guide, you’ll see how they really stack up: juice quality, prep time, cleanup effort, and overall ease of use. And if neither one feels like the right fit? There’s a third option that might suit your needs.
Let’s begin, shall we?
Nama vs Kuvings: Quick Overview
Kuvings and Nama are two familiar names in the premium juicer space. If you’ve done any real digging into cold press juicers, you’ve seen them mentioned again and again. Both promise smoother juice, higher yield, and a better experience than your average kitchen appliance.
Nama is the newer brand in the spotlight. It focuses on clean design, ease of use, and hands-free functionality. Their approach is all about making cold-pressed juice more approachable, especially for people just starting out or looking to simplify their routine.
Meanwhile, Kuvings brings more years to the table. With a wide product line, it caters to users who want power, size, and extra features (like smoothie and sorbet attachments) packed into a single machine. It's positioned as a go-to for anyone juicing frequently or in larger batches.
Both brands rely on cold press (or masticating) technology to protect nutrients, reduce foam, and deliver smooth, fresh juice.
They use a vertical design, sit in the premium price range, and are manufactured in South Korea (known for its strong engineering in this category).
Did you know? Nama is manufactured in Hurom’s facilities in South Korea, using its patented Slow Squeeze Technology. Hurom is a pioneer of cold-press juicing and the creator of the patented Slow Squeeze Technology, which it also licenses to select premium brands like Omega.
At a glance, Nama and Kuvings seem pretty similar. But once you get into daily use (prep time, cleanup, and how each one handles real ingredients), the differences start to show fast.
Kuvings vs Nama: Review of Top Models
Before we line them up side by side, here’s a closer look at what each model brings to the table.
Nama J2 Review
First off, the Nama J2 cold press juicer is made for hands-free juicing. Load your ingredients, close the lid, and walk away. That’s the whole pitch, and for the most part, it holds up.
Juice comes out smooth, even with greens or softer produce. Foam stays low, pulp stays dry, and the machine stays quiet. You can also use it for sorbets, plant-based milks, and smoothies. It fits into a weekday routine without taking over the whole kitchen.
What slows it down is what comes after.
Assembly takes a minute than some people would like, and so does cleanup. The parts aren’t dishwasher-safe, and they’re light enough that you’ll want to handle them carefully.
Highlights:
-
Self-feeding hopper
-
Strong results with greens and soft fruit
-
Dry pulp, low foam
-
Quiet operation
-
15-year motor warranty
-
Versatile
What to keep in mind:
-
Premium price
-
Cleanup takes time
-
Multi-part setup
-
Fragile-feeling plastic parts
Kuvings Auto10 Review
On the other hand, the Kuvings Auto10 is built for volume. Its oversized hopper can take whole fruits and bulky veg, making it suitable for batch juicing or prepping ahead.
The motor’s made for long sessions, and with the right balance of ingredients, juice comes out smooth. It also ships with extra screens for smoothies, sorbets, and citrus juice, which adds some flexibility if you like to mix it up.
But Auto10’s size has a cost.
This juicer machine takes up serious counter space. Meanwhile, cleanup isn’t hard, just slow. And with tougher produce, you might still need to cut ingredients down.
Highlights:
-
Oversized hopper for whole ingredients
-
Solid for large batches
-
Includes citrus, smoothie, and sorbet screens
-
Quiet motor
-
Long motor warranty (up to 10 years)
-
Versatile
What to keep in mind:
-
Big footprint
-
Slower to clean
-
More parts to deal with
-
Inconsistent with dense produce
-
Build doesn’t always match the price
Kuvings Auto10 vs Nama J2: Head-to-Head Comparison
On paper, the Nama J2 and Kuvings Auto10 check a lot of the same boxes. Both are cold-press juicers with self-feeding hoppers, both aim to cut down your prep time, and both sit in the high-end price bracket.
But in daily use, they don’t feel the same. And that’s what really counts.
Below is a side-by-side look at how they stack up where it matters most: juice quality, cleanup, speed, and overall ease of use.
Some details are close. Others? Not so much.
| Feature | Nama J2 | Kuvings Auto10 |
|---|---|---|
| Juice yield and pulp dryness | High yield, dry pulp | High yield, slightly wetter pulp |
| Performance with leafy greens | Strong, consistent | Decent with soft greens, mixed results with tougher ones |
| Performance with fibrous veg | Handles well | Struggles with hard or dense produce |
| Performance with soft fruits | Smooth texture, low foam | Good with balance, can clog if overloaded |
| Prep time before juicing | Minimal (batch loading) | Low prep, but it works better with some cutting |
| Hands-free functionality | Fully hands-free | Hands-free, but a heavier lid and more friction |
| Ease of daily use | Simple interface, fast start | More steps to assemble and start |
| Cleanup time and effort | Moderate (multiple parts) | Slower cleanup, more parts, and crevices |
| Noise level | Quiet operation | Quiet operation |
| Build quality and materials | Lightweight plastics, careful handling needed | Heavier build, some parts feel less refined |
| Versatility and extra parts | Yes (sorbet attachment); can make plant-based milks and smoothies | Included: juicing strainer, smoothie strainer, sorbet strainer. Sold separately: citrus attachment |
| Warranty coverage | 15-year motor warranty | 10-year motor warranty (varies by region) |
| Price range | $$$ | $$$ |
| Overall long-term value | Good for smaller spaces, light routine | Better for larger batches, but less convenient daily |
Some trade-offs are clear: Nama wins on setup and leafy greens, while Kuvings pulls ahead with batch size and extra features.
Need to see a real-use comparison? Here’s one:
Now, if you’re thinking beyond the specs, the real question is: Do these juicers make your routine easier, or just more complicated with extra steps?
And that’s where a third option starts to make a lot of sense.
Why Hurom Is the Best Alternative to Nama and Kuvings
As you saw, Nama and Kuvings both aim to make juicing easier. And in many ways, they do. But when you look at what gets in the way (extra parts, long cleanup, oversized designs), that’s where people start looking for something better.
That’s where Hurom fits in.

Hurom slow juicers are built for real daily use. You still get hands-free loading and smooth, nutrient-rich juice, but with fewer parts and faster cleanup.
All Hurom models use the brand’s patented Slow Squeeze technology, which mimics the motion of hand-pressing juice at low RPMs. That means less heat, better flavour, and longer-lasting juice.
Also, these are more than one-trick machines. From leafy greens to fibrous vegetables, frozen fruits, nut milks, and sorbets, Hurom handles it without clogging or straining.
And since many of their models are part of the Easy Clean line, you won’t be stuck scrubbing strainers after every use.
Add a 15-year motor warranty, solid build quality, and a design that actually works in a real kitchen, and you’ve got a premium juicer that’s built to stick around.
Now, how do Hurom compare with Nama and Kuvings’ top models?
Let’s take a closer look:
Hurom H400 vs Kuvings Auto10
As you have seen, the Kuvings Auto10 was clearly built for batch juicing. But the trade-off is size. It’s heavy, bulky, and not exactly fun to clean. It’s good if you’re juicing for four people. But not so good if you’re working with limited counter space, or just want less hassle.
In comparison, the Hurom H400 gives a better balance.
This model is compact enough to fit easily on the counter, but still powerful enough for back-to-back batches. The wide hopper cuts down prep time, and the Easy Clean design makes cleanup fast, without scrubbing or extra mess. Since it’s strainer-free, it means fewer parts to manage, and you can rinse everything in under a minute.

Juice comes out smooth, balanced, and rich in flavour. It handles everything from soft fruits to fibrous veg with ease, and even performs well with leafy greens. All without needing constant adjustment.
Also, you don’t need to babysit it. Like the Auto10, it’s built for hands-free operation. But the H400 does it with fewer moving parts and a smarter design that feels lighter, faster, and just… easier.
Bonus? The H400 was named the best juicer of 2024 in the Forbes Vetted Awards. Also, it’s a favourite of executive private chef Ana Machado and NFL star Nick Bosa.
So yes, this model it’s built to perform, not just to look good on paper.
Key features of the Hurom H400:
-
Part of the Easy Clean line
-
Strainer-free design for faster cleanup
-
Wide hopper for minimal prep
-
Smooth, high-yield juice with minimal foam
-
Works well for batch juicing
-
15-year motor warranty
-
Sleek, minimalist build that stores easily
Hurom H70 vs Nama J2
The Nama J2 pitches the hands-free dream, but it still makes you work after the juice is done. Multiple parts, no dishwasher-safe components, and a cleaning process that’s more time-consuming than expected.
Meanwhile, the Hurom H70 simplifies the whole experience.
It has a self-feeding hopper, just like the J2, but adds the Easy Clean design so you’re not stuck rinsing filters or scrubbing pulp out of corners. Its no-strainer system means you can rinse and move on without stress.

The H70 is also more compact, which makes it easier to keep out without losing half your prep space. And even with the smaller footprint, it handles everything: fruit and vegetable drinks, green juices, nut milks and butters, sauces, sorbets, and more. All without stalling or straining.
Juice texture is smooth, and it performs consistently well with both soft and hard ingredients. For a mid-size cold-press juicer, it punches above its weight.
And here’s what seals it: The H70 regularly earns near-perfect reviews across Amazon and Shopify. Also, it’s been featured on NBC and also won at the Good Housekeeping Kitchen Awards 2026. That kind of consistency (from real users and major outlets) sets it apart.
Key features of the Hurom H70:
-
Self-feeding hopper for hands-free loading
-
Easy Clean, no-strainer design
-
Compact size, ideal for small kitchens
-
Great for nut milk, frozen fruits, and everyday juicing
-
BPA-free parts and safety-first design
-
Smooth juice from both soft and tough produce
-
15-year motor warranty
-
Consistently top-rated by users and media
So, Which Juicer Actually Fits Your Life?
Nama and Kuvings both offer solid machines. If you value hands-free juicers, decent juice yield, and quiet motors, neither one is a bad choice. But that doesn’t mean they’re the easiest to live with.
As you’ve seen in this review, the Nama J2 keeps things smooth during juicing, but cleanup is slow. And the Kuvings Auto10 takes whole produce, but takes over your kitchen in the process.
Beyond them, Hurom lands in a better place.
You still get the benefits that both brands offer: batch juicing, smooth texture, and high-quality cold-pressed juice. But all with fewer parts, a smarter design, and a much easier cleanup.
So if you're looking for a premium slow juicer that fits into your actual routine, Hurom juicers are worth a serious look.
FAQs
Is Nama a reputable company?
Yes. Nama’s built a solid reputation around its clean design and hands-free approach. It’s not the oldest brand on the block, but it’s gained serious traction thanks to the J2. However, the brand is still in its early days, and long-term durability is something buyers are keeping an eye on.
Who manufactures the Nama juicer?
Nama juicers, including the J2, are made in South Korea in Hurom’s facilities. As such, it uses its patented Slow Squeeze Technology. The engineering is solid, and the rest comes down to how well it’s built and how it holds up over time.
How do Kuvings and Nama brands differ in terms of juicer technology and design?
Both use cold-press technology and offer self-feeding hoppers. But the priorities are different. Nama goes all-in on simplicity, while Kuvings adds more power and extra strainers (like the separately-sold citrus strainer).
At the end of the day, you’re trading one type of complexity for another.
Are Kuvings juicers worth the price?
If you’re juicing for a crowd or doing big batches, maybe. The Auto10 is built for volume. But it takes up space, cleanup isn’t quick, and it’s not exactly cheap. For most daily routines, it’s probably more machine than you need.
How do Hurom juicers compare to Kuvings and Nama in terms of price and features?
Hurom plays in the same price range, but it’s smarter about how it spends that budget. You still get batch juicers, cold press tech, and hands-free hoppers. But you do it with fewer parts, faster cleanup, and a design that actually fits into your kitchen.
Which juicer brand offers the best performance: Nama, Kuvings, or Hurom?
All three can make good juice. But if you want performance without the trade-offs, Hurom wins. It handles greens, fibrous veg, soft fruits, sauces, ice cream, nut butters, plant-based milks… You name it. All without dragging you through a 10-minute cleaning session afterward.
Which is better for cold-pressed juice: Nama, Kuvings, or Hurom?
They all produce cold-pressed juice. But with Hurom, you get more than just a good result. The texture is smoother, the flavour stays balanced, and the juice holds up longer in the fridge. Add faster cleanup and fewer steps, and that’s what makes a bigger impact long term.