Hurom H400 vs Nama J2: Which Slow Juicer Is Actually Worth It?

At first glance, the Hurom H400 and Nama J2 promise nearly the same thing: load the hopper, press start, and spend less time feeding produce by hand. Both handle fruits, vegetables, and leafy greens, and both suit people who make more than one glass at a time.

But the juicing session doesn’t end when the last drop lands in the container. Juice texture, cleaning, counter space, and the parts inside each machine can change how easy it feels to use every week.

This Hurom H400 vs. Nama J2 comparison breaks down those differences and helps you choose the better fit. Let’s take a look, shall we?

Hurom and Nama: Why Do They End Up on the Same Shortlist?

Hurom and Nama land on the same shortlist for a simple reason: both offer premium juicers for those who want less hands-on work and enough capacity for several servings.

Hurom has been developing kitchen appliances since 1974. It later introduced its first slow juicer and patented Slow Squeeze Technology in 2005. Its current lineup focuses on straightforward assembly, steady pressing, and machines made for different home routines.

Meanwhile, Nama is a newer name in the juicing space, with a lineup centered largely on hands-free, self-feeding juicing. The J2 has become one of its best-known models, combining a large hopper with a design meant to handle mixed ingredients with less hands-on prep. 

There’s also a manufacturing connection between both. Hurom states that Nama juicers are made at its facilities in South Korea. It also licenses its patented technology to other premium brands, including Omega.

Also, the Hurom H400 and the Nama J2 make the comparison especially close. Both have self-feeding hoppers, slow extraction, room for multiple servings, and long warranty coverage. If you’re ready to invest in a juicer for regular home use, both can easily end up on your shortlist.

A closer look at each model shows where that shared purpose begins to split.

What Does the Hurom H400 Offer?

The Hurom H400 is made for those who want to load plenty of produce without feeding every apple, carrot, or handful of greens one at a time.

Its large self-feeding hopper holds mixed ingredients and guides them toward the pressing chamber. You can load most of the recipe before starting, then let the machine handle much of the work while you finish breakfast or tidy the counter.

Inside, two auger pieces press and filter the produce without blades or a conventional fine-mesh screen. The pieces fit together closely enough to separate juice from pulp, which creates a strainer-free chamber with a fairly simple internal setup.

The front window lets you keep an eye on the chamber as it fills. A nesting pulp container fits into the body, so the full setup stays neat on the counter. Separate juice and pulp containers are included, while the detachable power cord makes the machine easier to store.

The box also contains the hopper, chamber, upper and lower augers, pusher, cleaning brush, manual, and recipe book. This complete setup belongs to Hurom’s Easy Clean collection, and the H400 is the largest model in that line.

Pro Tip: Want more details? This Hurom H400 review gives you a closer look at its everyday workflow, versatility, and place in the Easy Clean Series. 

What Does the Nama Juicer J2 Offer?

The Nama Juicer J2 starts with the same basic idea as other hands-free machines: you load several ingredients into the hopper instead of feeding each piece through a narrow chute.

Once the lid is in place, the produce moves from the hopper toward a slow auger. The auger presses it against the selected strainer, then the juice and pulp leave through separate outlets.

Nama includes two filtration options. The standard juice strainer keeps more pulp out of the glass, while the coarse strainer allows a thicker texture. A spinning brush moves around the strainer during juicing and helps keep the juice flowing through its small openings.

The box also includes the chamber, hopper, lid, auger, pusher, cleaning brush, juice container with a lid, pulp container, detachable power cord, recipe book, and quick-start guide. Also, the J2 can work with optional attachments and support recipes beyond standard juice. 

Now that both machines have been introduced, their specifications can be placed side by side.

Hurom H400 vs. Nama J2: How Do They Compare at a Glance?

The H400 and J2 share the features that bring most buyers to this category. Both have self-feeding hoppers, vertical chambers, low-speed augers, and enough capacity for more than one serving.

Still, their internal setups tell two different stories. The figures below come from the official Hurom H400 and Nama J2 product pages. Prices were checked on August 31, 2026.

Quick side-by-side comparison

Those differences look simple in a table. Daily use shows how much they actually matter.

Pro Tip: If juice texture is still the deciding factor, an alternative to the H400 is the Hurom H320. It uses a traditional mesh strainer for ultra-low-pulp juice, while the H400 keeps cleanup simpler. 

Hurom H400 vs. Nama J2: Which Performs Better in Everyday Use?

Specifications give you a useful starting point. The real differences appear once the produce is on the counter, and both machines have to move through the full routine.

Which Juicer Is Easier to Clean, Hurom H400 or Nama J2?

The clearest difference appears at the sink.

The H400 has a chamber, two auger pieces, and a pulp outlet to rinse. The auger separates into upper and lower parts, so water can reach the surfaces that press and filter the produce. There are no tiny mesh holes to brush one by one.

Meanwhile, the J2 is still manageable to wash, but it has a few more areas that need attention. Its fine or coarse strainer sits inside a spinning brush, and pulp can remain around both pieces. The cleaning brush helps, but it adds another step before reassembly.

A JuiceNext test put numbers behind that difference. After juicing 500 grams of celery, the H400 took an average of 1 minute and 51 seconds to clean, while the J2 took 2 minutes and 9 seconds. That is an 18-second gap in one test, but the value adds up when the juicer comes out several times a week.

That difference also shows up in user conversations. In the comments on Sprint Kitchen’s review comparing both models, viewers pointed to cleanup as a deciding factor. In fact,  H400 owners highlighted how much easier it made their regular juicing routine.

Bottom line? Both machines reduce the work during loading, but the H400 takes less of it back once the session ends.

Which Has the Better Self-Feeding Design, Hurom H400 or Nama J2?

Both hoppers let you load a mixed recipe before turning on the machine. That frees you from dropping in every carrot or apple one at a time.

The H400 has a large loading area and a separate opening for adding more produce during operation. Its hopper cuts ingredients as they move toward the auger, though the pusher can help when light leaves stay near the top.

For the J2, the process feels similarly hands-free. You load the hopper, close the lid, and let the produce settle toward the chamber. Its pusher is useful when fibrous pieces need a little encouragement.

Still, hands-free doesn’t mean preparation-free. Hard pits need to come out, thick peels may need removing, and oversized ingredients can slow either machine. Long celery stalks and cucumber also move more smoothly when cut into shorter sections.

A Woman & Home reviewer reached the same conclusion after two years with the J2: “You'll also need to chop the cucumber and celery into at most 3-inch pieces, as the Nama needs a little help feeding them in.”

In short, both machines reduce active feeding. The H400 feels a little more flexible when you want to add ingredients after the batch has started.

Pro Tip: A family-size hopper makes batch prep easier, but storage matters too. Our batch juicing guide breaks down safe storage, timing, and practical ways to prepare multiple servings. 

How Do Juice Yield, Pulp Dryness, and Texture Compare?

A fair yield test needs the same ingredient weight, freshness, cutting method, and straining process. Even a softer apple or older bunch of celery can change the amount in the glass.

In JuiceNext’s same-method celery comparison, the J2 averaged 337 ml of strained juice from 500 grams of celery. The H400 averaged 305 ml. The J2 also left 6.9 grams of pulp in the strained juice, compared with 15.3 grams from the H400.

The reviewer summarized the tradeoff clearly: “The H400 wins on cleaning and loses on yield.”

However, that finding applies to one ingredient and one reviewer’s setup. It does not prove that the J2 will extract more from apples, carrots, citrus, or every mixed recipe.

Still, there is other support for the J2’s extraction. After testing 10 juicers with about 30 pounds of produce, The Guardian named it the best overall model and wrote: “It produced pulp that was dry and uniform (a sign of a high-quality machine) and bright-green juice.”

However, that test did not place the J2 directly against the H400.

Summarizing: The H400 makes smooth, low-pulp juice without a traditional screen, though some fine pulp may remain. Meanwhile, the J2 gives you more direct texture control through its fine and coarse strainers. 

Which Handles Leafy Greens and Fibrous Produce Better?

Overall, both juicers work better when greens are mixed with firm or watery ingredients. 

First off, the H400 handles mixed green juice well, especially when leaves are layered with firmer produce. Its two-part auger keeps ingredients moving without blades, though very light greens may need the pusher.

The J2 can also process demanding combinations. In a 2026 evaluation, Bon Appétit tested it with whole apples, carrots, beets, and kale and found that it moved through the batch without much noise. 

However, neither machine is immune to interruptions. Packing the hopper too tightly or adding several long stalks together can slow ingredient movement. Cutting fibrous produce and alternating textures makes a bigger difference than choosing based on RPM alone.

How Do They Compare in Noise, Counter Space, and Storage?

The H400 has the narrower base. Its 6.6 by 10.3-inch footprint uses about 68 square inches of counter area. The J2 measures 9.8 by 9 inches at the base, or about 88 square inches. That gives the H400 roughly 23% less countertop area.

The tradeoff sits in the other dimensions. The H400 is 18.5 inches tall and weighs 14.8 pounds. The J2 is 17.7 inches tall and weighs 12.1 pounds. The J2 is easier to move, while the H400 leaves more space beside the machine.

Cabinet clearance matters, too. The H400 needs slightly more height and depth, while the J2 needs more width. The juice and pulp containers also need room beside each machine while it runs. 

In terms of noise, both are also quieter than a typical blender or centrifugal juicer. In the mentioned JuiceNext celery test, the J2 averaged 71 dB and the H400 averaged 75 dB. Those numbers reflect one room and one measuring setup, so they should not be treated as universal noise ratings.

The safer choice is to measure the counter, the cabinet above it, and the space required for both containers before buying.

How Do Price, Accessories, Warranty, and Long-Term Value Compare?

Daily convenience matters, but it has to make sense beside the purchase price. This part of the decision comes down to what is included, what may cost extra, and what the machine asks from you over several years.

Price and What Comes in the Box

As of August 31, 2026, the Hurom H400 had a regular U.S. price of $749. The Nama J2 was $599. The H400 costs $150 more, which is about a 25% premium.

The J2 includes fine and coarse strainers, a spinning brush, a pusher, a cleaning brush, a juice container with a lid, and a pulp container. Meanwhile, the H400 includes its two-part multi-auger, chamber, pusher, cleaning brush, juice container, and nesting pulp container.

The H400’s higher price is not tied to a larger group of attachments. You are mainly paying for the strainer-free Easy Clean system, simpler rinsing, narrow base, and integrated pulp-container design.

Sales can narrow the difference, so regular and promotional prices should be checked separately.

The return terms also matter at this price:

• If you buy directly from Hurom, you have 30 days from delivery to return the machine, and Hurom provides a prepaid return label within the contiguous United States. 

• With Nama, the 30-day window starts from shipment; you cover return shipping, and an unwashed machine may come with a $100 fee. 

What Other Drinks and Foods Can You Make With These Juicers?

Both machines can press fruit, vegetables, leafy greens, and soaked ingredients for plant-based milk.

At first glance, the J2 has the broader accessory selection. Nama sells a citrus attachment, a sorbet attachment, a larger hopper, a larger pitcher, and additional containers separately. These can support frozen recipes, citrus juice, thicker preparations, and bigger batches.

For its standard setup, the H400 takes a more focused approach. Its multi-auger handles everyday juice and plant-based milk without swapping between fine and coarse mesh screens. Replacement chamber pieces and containers are sold separately when available.

A longer accessory list adds value only if those pieces will be used. Someone making juice five mornings a week may get more from the H400’s shorter cleanup than from a sorbet attachment left in a cabinet.

How Do Warranty, Replacement Parts, and Support Compare?

Both machines advertise 15-year coverage, but the headline number doesn't tell you everything.

Hurom lists 15 years of coverage for the H400 motor and parts. Purchases made directly through Hurom.com are registered automatically, and the warranty applies to products sold and used in North America.

Nama covers J2 parts for 15 years under normal household use. The coverage applies to the original owner and purchases from Nama or an authorized retailer. A claim requires the serial number, proof of purchase, and photos or video of the issue. 

Pro Tip: Want more details? This breakdown of what the Hurom warranty covers explains the main terms without repeating the full policy language.

What Determines Long-Term Value?

Price only tells part of the story once a juicer becomes part of your routine.

If you juice regularly, it’s worth thinking about cleaning time, produce volume, preferred texture, available counter space, and access to replacement parts. If citrus or frozen recipes are also on your list, consider how regularly the extra attachments would leave the cabinet.

Also, motor wattage has little effect on ownership cost. At the average U.S. residential electricity price recorded through June 2026, running either machine for five minutes a day at its full rated power would cost roughly one dollar per year.

For a lower upfront price and more ways to adjust filtration or add attachments, the J2 has the advantage. If you’re comfortable with a larger initial investment, the H400 gives you a simpler internal setup and less work to deal with after each batch. 

So, Which Slow Juicer Fits Your Routine Better?

At this point, you’ve seen where the Hurom H400 and the Nama J2  two models start to pull apart. 

The easiest way to narrow down your choice is to look at which one feels closer to the way you’d actually use it at home.

Choose the Nama J2 if...

• You want the lower regular purchase price.

• Traditional fine-mesh straining appeals to you.

• You want a coarse strainer included for thicker juice.

• Accessories are on your wish list.

• You prefer a shorter machine.

• You don’t mind brushing the strainer and spinning brush.

• Direct texture control matters more than the fastest cleanup.

Choose the Hurom H400 if...

• You expect to juice several times per week.

• Spending less time cleaning after each batch sounds more appealing.

• A strainer-free system with no fine mesh holes suits your routine.

• Fewer internal pieces mean less to wash and reassemble.

• You have limited space across the width of your counter.

• You like adding more produce while the machine is running.

• Daily convenience matters more than having several attachments.

• You are comfortable paying more for the Easy Clean chamber.

In short: If paying less and having direct control over juice texture are higher on your list, the Nama J2 can be an option. For more frequent juicing, the Hurom H400 stands out for making the overall routine feel easier, from loading ingredients to cleanup and reassembly.

Pro Tip: If you’re considering other premium masticating juicers, take a look at this Hurom vs. Kuvings breakdown. It compares the brands across juicer design, everyday use, cleanup, and the types of routines each lineup supports.

Bottom Line: The H400 Makes Daily Juicing Easier

As you can see, both machines handle hands-free loading, mixed produce, and larger home batches. The Nama J2 can be appealing if you want a lower entry price, traditional strainers, and more optional attachments (that can increase the investment).

However, the Hurom H400 is the better fit for frequent use. Its narrow base, simple assembly, and strainer-free chamber remove some of the work that can make regular juicing harder to maintain.

It’s true that the H400 won’t suit every budget. Still, if you’re willing to spend more for an easier day-to-day routine, it can make that extra cost feel worthwhile over time.

FAQs

Which Juicer Produces Better Juice Quality: the Hurom H400 or the Nama J2?

Both produce smooth juice from mixed ingredients. The H400 may leave some fine pulp, while the J2 gives you direct texture control through its fine and coarse strainers.

Which Juicer Handles Leafy Greens and Wheatgrass Better?

The Hurom H400 and the Nama J2 both can process leafy greens and wheatgrass when they’re loaded in small amounts. Alternating them with cucumber, apple, or another firm ingredient helps keep the produce moving.

Is the Hurom H400 or Nama J2 Better for Batch Juicing?

Both suit multiple servings. The Nama Juicer J2 costs less, while the H400 combines a large hopper with easier cleanup after longer sessions.

Which Is Easier to Clean and Maintain: the Hurom H400 or Nama J2?

The H400 is easier to clean. Its two-part auger rinses without the detailed brushing required by the J2’s mesh strainer and spinning brush.

How Do the Hurom H400 and Nama J2 Compare in Price and Overall Value?

For the lower regular price, the J2 has the edge. If you juice frequently, the H400’s strainer-free chamber and shorter cleanup may make the higher price easier to justify.

How Do Their Warranties and Replacement-Part Options Compare?

Both advertise 15-year coverage, though their conditions differ. You should check seller authorization, regional limits, proof-of-purchase requirements, and current part availability.

Is the Hurom H400 or Nama J2 Better Overall?

The J2 is an option for a lower budget and adjustable filtration. But the H400 is the better overall fit for frequent juicing because it reduces the work required after each batch.